NLP Training Courses ? Sleight of Mouth

NLP Training Courses ? Sleight of Mouth

Sleight of mouth is an NLP training courses reframing pattern.  Reframing is a way to field questions and objections.  A reframe on the other hand, is an intervention intended to correct a person’s perceived meaning to a particular bit of information.  Sleight of mouth in NLP courses is also referred to as conversational belief change. 

These patterns may also be used to strengthen beliefs and are best used in combinations.  Rather than on proofs, these are based on mere plausibility.
This NLP training technique has many patterns classified into 4 basic types namely change meaning, change cause, comparisons and change logical level.
Following are examples of sleight of mouth patterns.

Example of a belief: NLP for business is not good for the particular type of organization that we have.

The following responses illustrate the various patterns under sleight of mouth but are not necessarily true about the NLP belief cited above:

1. Hierarchy of Criteria:  For this response to be effective, it must relate to the values of the person being responded to.

Rather than relying on opinions, don’t you think it is better to focus on your new objectives and how NLP can help achieve them?

2. Consequence: Because of that, your people are deprived of the best training opportunity available.

3. Another Outcome:  The issue is not on whether it is right for the organization but whether it is right for some people in the organization.

4. Metaphor:  Would a basketball coach who scouted the best ball clubs not be appropriate for a basketball team?  NLP for Business is about how the best in business achieve best business results.

5. Redefine 1:  It may not be right for your organization. Best results may be achieved with proper implementation.

6. Redefine 2:  NLP is about producing the best results, do you mean your organization is not for the best business results?

7. Chunk Down:  Which parts of NLP are not proper? In what specific ways are they improper?

8. Chunk Up:  You mean improvements in performance will never be appropriate?

9. Counter Example:  Is it not possible for one area of NLP to be right for your organization?  There should at least be one, right?  What would be right for you? Where would NLP be appropriate for?

10. Intent: It is not my intention to sell something inappropriate; but rather to benefit you with savings and increased efficiency which NLP may provide.

11. Model of the world:  That may be 100%t true based on your experience; However, similar organizations have differing experiences. Wouldn’t you be interested?

12. Reality Strategy:  How would you know NLP is not right for you?

13. Apply to self: That’s improper to say, knowing many other companies have benefitted.

14. Change Frame Size:  It may seem that way now, however, in five years, you’ll appreciate it.

15. Meta Frame: You only say that because you can’t handle the impact. I can guide you through the process.

Ready to learn more about NLP Training and NLP courses? Visit today for more information!

19. June 2011 by Admin
Categories: NLP | Tags: , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *